Strategic Planning addresses Shoreham's strategic, statutory and heritage planning needs, consistent with the SCA's objectives. While the SCA’s focus is primarily on the needs of Shoreham and it's surrounds, in order to meet these needs we also engage with other coastal and hinterland villages on broader strategic issues of mutual interest through the Red Hill Ward Consultative Group.
Protecting the Buxton Open Air Chapel
- The existence of an open air chapel, the remains of which can be found in Buxton Reserve at the bottom of Marine Parade, is a largely unknown aspect of Shoreham.
- The chapel was built in the 1940s and for some years was an integral part of life at the YMCA Buxton Camp. It serves as a memorial to two young men associated with the camp who were killed on service during World War II. The Cyril Young Memorial Chapel (as it was formally dedicated) is now listed on the Victorian War Heritage Inventory. Please see Heritage, Victoria's web-site for further information.
- Buxton Camp no longer exists. Part of its land is now the Buxton Reserve under management of the Mornington Peninsula Shire (MPS) and the remainder, including the camp buildings, is in private hands. However, the open air chapel still remains on the Reserve for the public to visit.
- On the 11th July, the MPS published a Notice of Intention to Sell Land on which the Buxton Chapel sits. The Shoreham Community Association (SCA) and the Flinders District Historical Society (FDHS), and anyone else who may wish to protest the chapel’s sale, had until the 11th August to make submissions to show why the sale should not go ahead.
Section 223 Committee Hearing
The Mornington Peninsula Shire Council notified objectors that it was to convene a Committee to consider submissions and to hear from those who requested to do so verbally. The Chapel item was listed for a Section 223 Committee Meeting on Monday 23rd October commencing at 6:30PM at the Council Chambers - 90 Besgrove Street, Rosebud.
- The meeting was open to the public and quite a few people, particularly from the Young family, came to witness the hearing.
- Ten interesting and sometimes passionate submissions were heard by the Committee including one from the SCA. Nine of the submissions opposed the sale.
- All submitters appeared to be in favour of the site being respectfully maintained going into the future. Several raised or supported the concept of a "Friends" group being established to that end.
Council Meeting on Tuesday 13th February, 2018
In great news for the community, Council voted unanimously on Tuesday 13th February to rescind the sale and acquire the small portion of the chapel in private hands instead.
Friends Group to be Organised
The next move will be to organise a "Friends" group to look after the site within Buxton Reserve. This is likely to include SCA members, members of the Flinders and District Historical Society, the Young family, former campers at Camp Buxton and others.
The first meeting of the Working Group was conducted on Saturday, 12th May, 2018. Excellent progress is being made. There was good representation from the Young family, the YMCA, the SCA and the broader community and general agreement on general aims and directions. The Historical Society could not be represented but there have already been exchanges of information between the Society and the other parties. Two of the local residents were former campers at Camp Buxton.
- The chapel formed part of the facilities at the YMCA Camp Buxton that was built around 1925, on land provided by the Buxton family. It was built in memory of Cyril Young, Chairman of the Camp Buxton Committee in 1939 and who died on active service in 1945. However, the still extant plaque on what remains of the lectern is dedicated to the memory of Ivan Charles Young, brother of Cyril, who died on service in 1942.
- In the 1990s, much of the Camp Buxton land was subdivided for housing with some land being added to the Buxton Reserve owned by the Shire. The buildings forming the old Camp Buxton were sold, along with associated land, into private ownership.
- Over the years the chapel seats have disappeared and the stonework has deteriorated but the chapel still remains a beautiful memorial not only to the two Young brothers but to Camp Buxton itself.
- Unfortunately, in the 1990s, when boundaries were surveyed for sub-division, the position of the chapel was not taken into account. This omission effectively placed about one third of the chapel land within the boundary of No 39 Marine Parade. The other two-thirds were left within Buxton Reserve. This anomaly is compounded by the fact that the part of the chapel on private land has a heritage overlay whilst the remainder on the public reserve does not.
- Ann Renkin, from the Flinders District Historical Society, provides a more detailed history of the chapel here.
For further information:
Peter Renkin 0448 319 719; Sue Boggan 0404 180 957; John McMahon 0411 142 731; or Kathryn Shain 0457 203 630. Or contact email@example.com
Open Air Chapel listed on the Victorian War Heritage Inventory
- The Cyril Young Memorial Chapel is now listed on the Victorian War Heritage Inventory. Please see Heritage, Victoria's web-site for further information.
Young Family Web-site
- The Young family has created a web-site in honour of their relatives which contains further information about Cyril and Ivan Young's war service and also interesting photos and stories about Camp Buxton in particular. Please click here to visit it.
Mornington Peninsula Green Wedge and Coastal Village Planning Issues
Reforming the Victoria Planning Provisions (VPP)
As part of the Red Hill Ward Consultative Group, the Shoreham Community Association, in conjunction with other community groups in the Red Hill Ward, is in the process of challenging recent State Government changes to planning provisions. The changes could adversely affect the character of Shoreham and the whole of the Mornington Peninsula. Under a program of Reforming the Victoria Planning Provisions, the State Government released the first tranche of changes in March 2017 and has called for a comments on a second set (which the SCA responded to).
The most important changes that became operative in March 2017, are:
- An increase to the building height limit and number of storeys allowable in General Residential Zone (GRZ). Much of the residential areas of the Peninsula, including Shoreham, is covered by the GRZ (see the map below for Shoreham).
- An increase in the threshold costs for development that can be fast-tracked through the VicSmart scheme. See https://www.planning.vic.gov.au/planning-permit-applications/vicsmart for more information.
For more details on the changes, please see: Shoreham Village Planning Issues.
In relation to the second set of changes targeted for mid 2018,
- DELWP planned to make a “Release of consultation summary” in “Early 2018”.
- This has not emerged to date.
What the changes mean for Shoreham
In 2014, the State Government ‘reformed’ residential zones across the state. The result was that most of the residential areas on the Mornington Peninsula were re-zoned General Residential Zone (GRZ). Much of Shoreham is now included in the GRZ (see areas shaded musk pink in the map below).
Shoreham is now divided into the following zones - (see map above):
- Two residential zones – General Residential Zone (GRZ) and Low Density Residential Zone (LDRZ);
- Two sets of properties in the Commercial 1 Zone (C1Z) – the new Post Office site development and three blocks on the corner of Byrnes and Prout Webb Road (presently housing and the former General Store);
- Other zones – eg Special Purpose, Public Use and Reserve Zones.
- A Green Wedge Zone (GWZ2) that surrounds the village.
The GRZ is the most affected by the recent amendments:
- In 2014, the GRZ included a mandatory building height limit of 9 metres with a maximum of 2 storeys.
- The amendments have increased those limits to 11 metres and 3 storeys.
The LDRZ and C1Z have not been changed. These zones have no mandatory height or storey limits – but see "Overlays" immediately below.
In addition, Shoreham is subject to the following "Overlays":
- Design and Development Overlays (DDOs). There are 4 DDOs over Shoreham -
- DDO2, DDO3 and DDO6 in relation to residential areas, and
- DDO15 in relation to the two commercial areas;
- Other overlays relating to landscape, environment, erosion, inundation, vegetation and heritage.
- DDO2, 3 and 6 are intended to ensure that development is responsive to the environment, landform, site conditions and character of areas - in particular coastal, bayside and rural residential areas.
- DDO2 and 3 both contain mandatory height limits of 8 metres and a 2 storey limit. These requirements cannot be varied with a permit.
- DDO6 contains these limits but they are general requirements only and are not mandatory.
- DDO15 contains a mandatory height limit of 8.5 meters and a 2 storey limit.
How do Zone and DDO Overlays fit together?
- The DDOs provide control on building and development within the various residential and, in some cases, commercial zones. They are the strongest form of local control in the Victoria Planning Provisions, introduced by the Mornington Peninsula Shire (MPS), and were not changed with the recent State amendments.
- Controls (eg over height) in DDO2, 3 and 6 have, prior to the amendments, fitted more or less with controls set out in the zones, but they provided more clarity.
- However, since March 2017, there is a considerable discrepancy between the controls in the GRZ and those contained in DDO2 and 3 that overlay much of the residential areas covered by the GRZ - especially the difference between 8 and 11 metres and between 2 and 3 storeys.
- Although it is hoped that the DDOs will prevail over the state amendments, there is now some uncertainty about this, due in part to the lack of community and local government consultation prior to the introduction of these far reaching changes.
Effect of changes elsewhere on the Peninsula
- There are a number of towns and villages on the Peninsula, now included within the GRZ, that have no development control through a DDO. This means that much of the Peninsula will be open for 3 storey developments of up to 11 metres as-of-right.
- This will undoubtedly have significant consequences for the whole character of the Peninsula and threaten the present neighbourhood/coastal/rural village character that is prized by residents and visitors alike.
- It is difficult to clarify what specific effect these changes will have to Shoreham or the Peninsula as a whole. But it is clear that the changes to the threshold costs of developments processed through VicSmart will mean far more development will go ahead with no avenue for objection or appeal by those affected by development.
- The combined effect of the changes to VicSmart and changes to the GRZ could have far-reaching and damaging consequences for Shoreham and the Peninsula.
What is being done?
Housing and Settlement Strategy (HSS)
- MPS adopted a Housing and Settlement Strategy (HSS) to clarify future development over the Peninsula on 4th December, 2017. Please click here for a link to the MPS web page describing the strategy and providing links to download the documentation. The SCA made a submission on behalf of the Shoreham community based on the draft released for comment last September.
- Broadly speaking, the HSS is intended to address population changes within the municipality to 2030 at a high level. The good news is that the MPS has established that there is no need or intention to accommodate substantial new housing supply within the small coastal villages like Shoreham.
- In relation to zoning, the main (positive) impact is that MPS desires to convert most of the General Residential (GRZ) zones on the peninsula to Neighbourhood Residential (NRZ) which gives the highest level of zoning protection. This would protect areas not already protected by Design Overlays (DDOs) and replaces MPS' earlier tactic of defining a new DDO to especially cover those areas (which was rejected by the State Government on the pretext that the MPS did not have an HSS).
- The new set of changes is currently before the State Government for approval with the HSS as planning amendment C219.
- In relation to Shoreham specifically, the proposed NRZ zoning would have the effect of strengthening the protection already given by the various DDOs. In addition, the MPS proposes to change the overlay affecting land at the beach end of Cliff Road from DDO3 to DDO4 in line with the land being zoned NRZ Schedule 4.
Green Wedge Management Plan (GWMP)
- Other than its interface with Westernport Bay, the village of Shoreham is surrounded by farmland – all of which is zoned Green Wedge (Green Wedge Zone – Schedule 2- GWZ2). The Green Wedge land around Shoreham buffers the village from surrounding areas and provides Shoreham its separate identity as a place. This surrounding farmland is responsible for Shoreham's rural feel and is a very important contributor to our quality of life.
- Legitimate uses in Green Wedge areas include economic activities such as farming and tourism as well as environmental conservation such as National and State parks.
- MPS Council adopted an Interim Green Wedge Management Plan in September, 2012. After the HSS and C219 NRZ amendment discussed above, the GWMP is the next highest priority MPS Strategic Planning project – the call for initial submissions/comments was published on Tuesday, 27th February. MPS put out information on their website including background papers which contain revised recommendations on Tourism, farming, biodiversity etc. The actual GWMP plan has not been updated from the 2012 version at this point.
- Oral submissions can be made to Council’s Forward Planning Committee on the 21st March and written submissions were called for before the 5th April. The new draft plan is being prepared and will be exhibited for comment by the Council in due course.
- The SCA joined with the Red Hill Ward Consultative Group in making a submission on this matter.
Coastal Villages Study
- MPS also plans to undertake a Coastal Villages Study. This is expected to be very important for Shoreham.
- SCA will certainly need to contribute submissions. We expect that Council will also make concerted community consultations ie not only rely on community groups like the SCA, to provide the main feedback.
- We will let you know more about this important study when we find out more!
If you have queries about the changes to the planning provisions please contact one of the following persons who represent the SCA Planning Sub-Committee:
- Sue Boggan 0404 180 957
- John McMahon 0411 142 731
- Kathryn Shain 0457 203 630
- Peter Renkin 0448 319 719.
Or e-mail firstname.lastname@example.org .
Post Office Site - November 2017
The Post Office development is well on its way after commencing in late August, 2016. It is ten years since the proposal for two three storey, two-bedroom aged care apartments with underground parking was proposed by an oversees syndicate for the centre of Shoreham. The proposal saw the formation of the Shoreham Taskforce (now part of the Shoreham Community Association) that fought hard to prevent the inappropriate nature of the development – see the summary of the Taskforce's achievements for more details . There has been ongoing liaison with the present owner to achieve a satisfactory result. The position will continue to be monitored.
Work is steadily progressing on the Post Office Site shops - latest developments being the reopening of the Post Office in its new home and work starting on the “restaurant” framing at the southern end.
The Project Manager has made copies of the plans available; they are now on continual display at the Post Office.
We wish to acknowledge Leo Maher and the extensive and valuable time he gave to the Taskforce.
For enquiries please contact one of the SCA Taskforce members: Peter Renkin 5989 8818 or 0448 319 719; Sue Boggan 5989 8501 or 0404 180 957; or Rob Patrick 5989 8963 or 0408 429 944.
Shoreham Village Taskforce
Read the background to this group which has worked over many years to preserve the amenity of our coastal village.
Black Spot Commonwealth Government Roads Program
In mid-December 2015, the SCA Executive met with Minister Greg Hunt MP to gain his support for securing a Commonwealth grant enabling construction of safer road infrastructure at dangerous Shoreham road intersections. These dangerous intersections are where the Frankston-Flinders Road intersects with Nelson Street, with Byrnes Road (both north and south ends), Myers Drive, Higgins Lane and with Beach Road. SCA’s aim is to prevent the risk of a serious accident at one of these intersections - for example by the construction of slip/turning lanes at the Nelson Street intersection.
The Australian Government’s ‘Black Spot Program’ funding round for 2017-18 is now open. The program identifies high risk locations and funds measures to prevent accidents that cause death and/or injury.
During discussions with Mr Hunt, SCA was told he will support our application for ‘Black Spot Program’ funding. The SCA has made a Nomination for this funding that has been endorsed by the Shoreham Rural Fire Brigade. A letter of endorsement from the Mornington Peninsula Shire is also sought. Mr Hunt will submit the Nomination and supporting letters.
To date, no further information received. SCA has therefore requested another meeting with Mr Hunt to progress the matter. Recently appointed Red Hill Ward Councillor, David Gill, has also been alerted to our concerns so that he can progress the matter within Council.
Refusal of Planning Application to demolish heritage listed ‘Alavina’, 16 Beach Road
The owners of ‘Alavina’ sought Council approval to demolish the heritage-listed house in Beach Road. In 2013 parcels of land were removed from a larger heritage overlay area covering nos 14, 16 and 18 Beach Road, leaving the Shire to make a historical assessment of ‘Alavina’ and an assessment of the adjacent timber cottage. This has not been done and the owners are allowing the buildings to deteriorate.
SCA submitted an objection to the application to demolish based on the fact that:
- heritage planning procedures were determined following an independent Hearing in April 2013;
- MPS has not completed its task as set by the Hearing; and
- restoring ‘Alavina’ will make it a valuable asset.
SCA has been told that Council have refused the application to demolish. The owners have the right to appeal to the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal.
Former General Store Site - November, 2017
The attention of the developer has also focussed on draft drawings for the former General Store site.
The SCA Committee recognises how important this development is to Shoreham people. When draft plans were drawn up by the developer’s agent, the SCA Taskforce handed these to the panel of local Architects (advisers to the Taskforce) for their opinion. Late last year the Architects and the Taskforce met with the owner’s agent to discuss his drawings. It was agreed that the Architects prepare alternative designs.
It is hoped that when ready, the Architects draft alternative plans for the site will be presented by the SCA at a public meeting in order to seek comment from the Shoreham people. The SCA Committee will seek a mandate from the meeting to enable it to represent the voice of Shoreham to the developer and to the Shire.
Recently, maintenance work (replacement of weatherboards and painting) has commenced - indicating that there's still life in the former General Sotre!
Red Hill Ward Consultative Group (RHWCG) and Residents' Association Meetings (RAM)
Red Hill Ward Consultative Group (RHWCG)
- Shoreham falls within the Red Hill Ward of the Municipality.
- The RHWCG brings representatives together for bi-monthly discussions in the Shoreham Hall. The Group’s name reflects our local government electoral ward which covers 75% of the Mornington Peninsula Shire’s area. Other communities directly represented include Balnarring, Balnarring Beach, Merricks Beach, Merricks Township, Somers, Flinders, Cape Schanck and Red Hill. There is also a representative from “Peninsula Speaks”.
- The RHWCG helps to shape the collective future for the Ward by providing a platform for community associations to exchange information, network and discuss strategic issues. It enables discussion on a range of matters that can then be voiced at the Residents' Association Meetings (RAM).
Residents' Association Meetings (RAM)
- RAM was an initiative of our former Red Hill Ward Cr Tim Wood - whereby all community associations across the Red Hill Ward could send representatives to meetings every two months to air and discuss matters of common concern.
- Our current Councillor, David Gill, has kept the meetings going and we look forward to continue collaborating with our colleagues from other towns and villages in our ward. Submissions are made in advance of each meeting.
If you wish to raise matters of significance to the broader ward please contact the SCA representatives Peter Renkin (President, SCA ) or Sue Boggan (SCA Planning Sub-committee).